Integrality is used in Infinity in a Drop to indicate that things can be understood fully only in the context of the whole of which they are a part. If this had been all, integrality would already have been an amazingly powerful concept. But integrality as translation of purna has besides this, also a much more profound meaning. This deeper meaning of integrality can only be understood from a consciousness in which one knows the Divine, and that not only as the Transcendent, not only as the Cosmic whole, but also, and equally, in every detail of the manifestation, in oneself, in every thing, and in all others. To use a phrase from Sri Aurobindo's Savitri, the full meaning of integrality can only be known in an inner state in which one feels "love and oneness" in their full depth, completeness, and all-sided perfection. As may be clear, that type of consciousness is radically different from the one most of us presently have, and to attain it is not exactly trivial. But fortunately it is not needed to create and understand integrality as foundation for a more wholesome science. For this, a simple, mental understanding of integrality is all that is needed. The reason that this is sufficient, at least initially, is that the basic pattern of integrality is the same everywhere, and on a more simple, mental level, this pattern is not that difficult to discern.
One can illustrate the basic principle of integrality perhaps most simply with how it operates in human constructions, like buildings and man-made products in general. For example, since a car is made out of parts, the construction of the car seems to be a completely technical matter: its construction seems to consist entierly of physical processes. The parts are put together through processes that you can fully understand physically, whether they are executed by machines or by men. So it appears that you can explain a car completely in terms of physical parts and physical processes. But after you’ve done that, and you’ve convinced yourself that the physical reality is a causally closed system, you find that there is something seriously amiss. The reason is that most of these parts would never have existed if the concept of the car had not been there. You cannot have a steering wheel if you don’t have the concept of a car, you cannot have a brake if you don’t have a car — even parts that have an existence independent of the car, like the lights, have changed beyond recognition when incorporated in this particular whole. So obviously this physical, reductionist explanation from down up is incomplete. There remains something that can only be explained from the top down.
The secret is that if you look at reality only in physical terms, you will never find what it is in the whole that goes beyond the sum of the parts, because that extra ingredient is not physical. The mysterious extra that is there in a car besides the parts, is what makes the car a car; it is the concept of the car, the design of the car as a whole, and this design has a kind of double existence: it exists in its own domain, as an idea within a world of ideas, and it exists also as an integral part of an assembly of physical things; as such it is as if embedded in the physical world. And these two worlds, one largely mental, one primarily physical but with mental elements embedded in it, are not the same. As we will see later in more detail, they differ in some pretty fundamental ways.
Integrality as a basic concept, always involves a higher order reality that encompasses, enriches, combines, inhabits and shapes things from a lower level of reality. In mathematics, when one integrates a two-dimensional circle, one arrives at a three-dimensional sphere of which the circle is a section. In spirituality, the ultimate, the Supreme encompasses, and inhabits, all that is below it. In the realm of technology, a car is a higher order unity than the parts that it contains. Not only does it combine independent, pre-existing parts, but it also influences the exact form and structure of each part according to the specific place and function that part will have in the whole. In other words, to quite an extent, it is the whole that makes the part what it is. And so, to appreciate why each part is the way it is, what its special qualities, form and structure are, you need to know the whole to which it belongs. And this goes much further than one might realise at the beginning. To understand the details of say the steering wheel or the lights of a car, you need to understand not only the rest of the car, but also the human body, human psychology, and the environment in which the car will operate. To understand the materials that are used, you need not only understand chemistry and material sciences but also the economy, and so you have to take even politics into account. For the lights, you need to understand the weather and the legal structures in the different countries where the car will be sold. In fact, to fully understand anything, you need to understand everything. And if you tie the whole and the parts together in the right manner, you'll find that understanding the whole enriches and deepens your understanding of the parts. One could even say that the parts find their fulfilment in the way their unique qualities contribute to the whole of which they are a part.
Figure 05b-1. A hierarchy of oneness containing the many
For a more complete understanding of the role integrality plays in our lives, there are several further points to consider. The first is that the world does not consist of a single set of wholes with parts. Within the human range, every whole has parts, and every whole is itself part of one or more larger wholes. While the car has lights, these lights, in their turn, have their own parts, and these theirs. Similarly in the opposite direction: the production of the car is part of the manufacturing world and as such, part of the economy. Its usage has to do with self-expression as well as with community and sharing. Both are part of what happens on our planet, and up it goes all the way to "the universe" and possibly beyond. We humans appear to live somewhere in the midst of a hugely complex hierarchy of being, consciousness, love and delight.
The second point is that our mind has an amazing ability to race up, down, and sideways within these complex hierarchies. So while reading this text, you can concentrate on something as small as the downward and backward pointing extension of the comma after this phrase, or widen, as-if-backwards, to this text as a whole, or the place where you sit, the house, the country, the planet, right up to that same universe.
The third is that our moving around in the hierarchy of being is to quite an extent outside our direct conscious control: as long as you continue reading, for example, you can hardly escape thinking of whatever is described in this text, even if it is as completely out of place as a zebra or as non-existing as a green elephant. And yet, it does not appear to be true that we are entirely the helpless victims of our senses. We seem to have some degree of conscious control over the focus of our attention, both individually and collectively.
The fourth, and perhaps most interesting aspect of integrality is, that while the range within the total hierarchy of being which we humans can access biologically, is extremely limited, we appear to have reached a stage in our "post-biological evolution"1 where there seems to be no limit to the extent that we can go beyond that biological range. In the physical domain our natural capacity to perceive and influence physical things are rather precisely and narrowly limited. But with the help of increasingly complex and sophisticated physical instruments, we can now access ranges of light, energy, space and time, way beyond those which our biological eyes and ears can perceive. We have manufactured planet-scale networks for trade and information, we can watch the borders of the universe and the beginning of time, and we can manufacture new molecules at our pleasure. We have become miniature (and rather irresponsible) co-creators of the world. But this is not all. While science has been bravely exploring the upper and lower limits of the physical domain, the Indian civilization has found ways to pursue the psychological domain, turning human nature into a reliable instrument for the study of consciousness, discovering ways to change our human nature and reach the ineffable beyond the top of the hierarchy of being. And it is on this aspect of the human adventure that this text is focused.
Figure 05b-2. Moving up and out
When one thinks of integrality in the context of psychology, one realises that for psychology, one needs an integrality that is absolute. It needs to encompass not only all the physical stuff but also every other aspect of human existence. And, as the purna stotra asserts, this can only be done if one integrates all these aspects into something that is beyond absolutely everything, in other words, the One without a second. If one wants to find a truly integral view of reality, one needs a worldview that is not just a combination, let alone an amalgamation2 of a hundred similar or dissimilar scientific and spiritual approaches. One needs something that rises out above all of them, something that is capable of holding them all up within a comprehensive, higher-order vision, something that clarifies the entire ladder from the top to the bottom and back. The foundations for such a higher order view can be found, according to Sri Aurobindo, in what he calls the "original Vedānta", the most ancient Vedic view of reality which seems to transcend and encompass not only the many different and often contradictory spiritual conceptualizations of reality that India developed later, but even many, if not all the others that humanity has come up with over time.
And with this, we have come full circle: it is the all-inclusive Vedic concept of integrality which describes how we humans can grow into dynamic centres of an ever higher, ever more inclusive consciousness, or as we expressed it in the previous chapter a bit more poetically, how all of infinity can be present in a single drop.
To arrive at a more detailed picture of the role integrality plays in ourselves and in the lives we live, we need a good understanding of consciousness and the way our human consciousness has evolved during the evolution. Once we have a clearer understanding of consciousness and its still ongoing evolution, we will be in a position to formulate clearly and simply the basic understanding of reality and knowledge that is needed to turn psychology into the effective and quickly cumulative science Infinity in a Drop tries to help bring about.
1These evolutionary stages will be discussed in more detail in the chapter on The evolution of consciousness
2Integrality is sometimes confused with amalgamation, but they are not remotely the same. Both describe ways in which different entities are combined into something new that has qualities that go beyond the qualities of the constituent elements, but the manner in which this is achieved is entirely different. In amalgamation the end product is a homogeneous mass in which the elements lose their original qualities and identities. A typical example is how the combination of copper and zinc produces brass which is more hard and rustproof than either of its constituents. In integration the constituent parts retain their individuality, and find a higher fulfilment, a better fit for their distinct qualities and capacities. Typical technical examples are how a car or a cell phone is made out of parts that have hardly any use outside the composite for which they are meant.
To receive info on
Indian Psychology and the IPI website,
please enter your name, email, etc.