last revision: 19 September 2023
The Indian civilisation can make major contributions to virtually all areas in which modern psychology is presently lacking.
Its earliest formulations can be found in some of the oldest Indian texts like the Ṛg Veda, the early Upaniṣads and the Bhagavad Gītā. The "Vedic paradigm" given in these texts functions as a loving grandmother to the enormous variety of spiritual, philosophical, religious and cultural schools which India later brought forth. Outside India, it has been mainly these later traditions that have made an impact. One can think for example of the Buddhist meditation techniques that have spread since millennia throughout Asia and in more recent times in Europe and the Americas and the "eightfold path" described in Patanjali's Yogasutras wich became popular amongst American practitioners of hatha-yoga. There is an extensive body of research about them, and there can be no reasonable doubt about their value for self-development and therapy.
The older, more integral tradition is interesting for a different reason. It is its ability to support and nurture in an impartial (and often surprisingly modern) manner, the entire range of human efforts at understanding and improving the world and ourselves, whether religious, cultural, spiritual, or scientific. As science and technology are removing the distances that used to keep people and cultures apart, it is hard to exaggerate how much humanity needs such an integral framework for understanding all aspects of reality, and all the different ways in which people deal with them.
In modern times, Sri Aurobindo is the main exponent of the integral Indian tradition, and we will make use of Sri Aurobindo's work based on the Vedic understanding of reality throughout this text.
With this we have arrived at what may well be the most important contribution the Indiancivilisation can make to modern science. While decontextualised forms of yoga and mindfulness are used on a large scale for well-being, their potential for providing detailed and reliable knowledge and know-how in the inner domain has hardly been touched. This is remarkable — and tragical — since in the culture of origin yoga was taken up not only for happiness, but also, and often primarily, for the sake of knowledge and wisdom.
It is a major theme of this text that these first two — the Indian understanding of the basic nature of reality and knowledge, together with its practical methods for the study of the inner domain — could revolutionise psychology and its applications in education, self-development, counselling, therapy, management, etc.
We will look at the epistemology and methodology in Part Two, "How do we know?".
One of the neat outcomes of the Indian approach is that it provides a logically coherent map of human nature in all its complexity, including things that are entirely beyond the scope of present day mainstream psychology.
Psychological theories and models will be taken up in Part Three, "Who am I?", and in the following chapters that deal with self-development and other applications of psychology.
As mentioned earlier, decontextualised versions of for example hathayoga and mindfulness, are already adopted by mainstream psychology on a large scale, and more comprehensive implementations are part of a variety of subcultures, but while all this is great for those who use them, it is not enough to take psychology further as a science. For that we need also to understand the first two contributions, the ontology and epistemology that gave rise to them.
We will explore a variety of such techniques for inner change and development together with the underlying theory in Part Four, "Working on oneself", and in Part Five, "Working with others".
Studying the Indian tradition is, however, not that simple. The Indian civilisation is extremely complex and so, if one wants to go beyond the usual platitudes, one has to choose between a selection and a synthesis. For one's own individual growth, a selection may well be the most efficient way to proceed, but since each Indian system has specialised in a different aspect of human nature, if we want to develop a comprehensive framework for the whole of psychology, what we need is a synthesis. Instead of attempting to make my own, for which I am ill-equipped, I've used for this text, the synthesis Sri Aurobindo made in the first half of the last century. For those who are interested, there is a short biography of Sri Aurobindo in the appendix.
One of the greatest contributions the Indian tradition has made to humanity, is the realisation that the consciousness at the center of our own being is still one with the Consciousness that manifested the world in and out of itself. And this is the secret behind the strange title of this text: